lost in her eyes

Posted by MichelG (Koksijde, Belgium) on 14 September 2007 in People & Portraits and Portfolio.

Some people say there is no difference between a 6 or 10 megapixel camera.
well there is, compare the pictures on this blog and you will see a big difference...

VFXY Photos | Listed on Photoblogs.org

Comments (10)

Andrew Gould from Sydney, Australia

Wonderful detail in this interestingly framed portrait. The eyes are absolutely fascinating!

14 Sep 2007 1:43am

Dimitrios from ATHENS, Greece

so SIZE matters e?, I supose for your kind of studio photography this is true, anyway, let continue the art-work and let everyone choose the SIZE! This is a super portrait nomatter the SIZE.

14 Sep 2007 1:48am

Mikel from Treto, Santander, Spain

Fantastic portrait, classic but warm and fine.
I like your portfolio very much

14 Sep 2007 2:33am

Shahab from Qazvin, Iran

Great & beautiful portrait shot!Nicely captured!

14 Sep 2007 2:47am

Babul Bhatt from Bombay, India

Lovely eyes, and you caught it very well.

People always get confused with the resolution and megapixels available on digital cameras:

There is no difference in 6 Meg and 10 Meg when viewing on a 1024 x 768 pixel monitor. You can't see anymore pixels per inch than what you have available on 1024x768 even if you have photographs from a 32 Meg camera. The only difference you will see is when you are actually trying to print. So when you talk about resolution it is two part one: on screen as displayed and second: on print.

Again jumping from a 6 meg camera to a 10 meg camera won't double the size of your print size! you need to go to atleast 24 meg camera to be able to get a double size print. Ken Rockwell is one person who demystifies these jargons easily as below:)

14 Sep 2007 4:46am

@Babul Bhatt: yes thats almost correct. But i can see on screen the difference between my old D100 and the newer D200 nikon DSLR. I use bot cameras side by side with the same lenses. Look at the pictures in my portfolio, compare and you will see it for yourself.
and on a print there is a huuuuuuuuuuuuugh difference.
thanks for your comments